Відео

After watching this video I can no longer be angry at For honor devs

Maybe take a look on Destiny on the subject of handguns as primary slot guns, Hand canons are kings there, even on PvP mode, and it always felt unique / powerful.

Ultrakill moment

let this man make an fps game already

its actually very easy. DayZ solved it by making you hold your breath to stabilize your crosshair. No stable cross hair. easy.

Destiny..

I don’t think adding the factor “a good player would do xyz” is a good point to add, since a good player would always do good with every weapon, regardless of it’s disadvantages/advantages

Battlebit bolt actions have increased damage after certain range. Close and mid range it is 2 shot kill (meaning you will die most likely). Long range or any range headshot - 1 shot kill

I feel anyone who says shotguns stimulate campibg are hipocrates actively tring to ignore the sniper rifle, THE LITERAL CAMPER WEAPON, casue shotguns actively fight camping, shotgun hsers rarely xamp and commonly are active moving around due to their limited range and better damage tehy are incentivised to move around and find people and work on reaction times and stealth as a shotgun is great for popping sround a corner and blasting soneone without them realising. Edit: that goes for ALL complaints shown near the start snipers are VERY monotone and neither is weak, snipers incentivise camping the most of every weapon, and snipers are kings of inconsistency, either EASILY ONESHOTING WITH A CLIKC ON THE HEAD or doing only half with a tap to the chest.

I am guessing you mainly wanted to talk about how games get shotgungs wrong, but imo battlefield does a pretty good job with them and I'm surprised you didnt talk about it at all. Especially the M320 Dart underbarrel attachment has insane range. Granted it only has 1 shot before you have to reload, but it's still insane at what ranges you can just 1hit someone with it.

ChatGPT is probably the worst place to pull your information from, it gets things wrong way too often. And get your subway surfers out of my screen, i'm trying to watch the video.

Ahahahaha A roblox game like decaying winter has an ability to make it so you can mix and match any pistol with any other pistol like shown in the video now that I think of it decaying winter is pretty realistic when it comes to guns (it's made to be hard to survive)

I’m watching this 6 minutes in, but BF1 had a good system. Medium damage up close but gains better damage with distance.

Aight. Snipers wasn't made for CS:GO, Valorant, and any small map. What does a sniper usually do? Hides in a room or in foliage, they completely hide themselves, they scout, they shoot from afar. (We don't talk about cod, bc it is complete arcade bs) Most games don't need the sniper, but battle royales, large scaled maps do. These are the situations it was made for. Yes there are polive force with relatively short range usage IRL, but the games that have issues with sniper balancing are really just arcade games, where you have to push stats around. In games like Arma, DayZ guns aren't toys. They are based on real life performance, ammo type, etc. Take Arma 3 for example. You have to calculate your long range shots (above like 6-700m). You have an ATragMX, a Kestrel, a rangefinder. You calculate based on humidity, wind speed and direction, gun and ammo characteristics, lead, etc. Can an AK fire back after you took a 2km shot? No. But you can move literally 30 cms and the sniper most likely won't hit you. Long range sniping is for taking out one asset (with a gun like AWP from CSGO). Closer distances? Yeah you can use a .50 to shred your opposition, but most likely you will take a DMR, which is a semi-auto rifle. You have better precision than ARs, sure, but in mid range, you can pick out a DMR with an AK/M4. TL:DR; Snipers are not made for "arcade", short distance games. Thats not their purpouse.

"Anything the Spy can do the Sniper can do better"

Ah, I see someone has discovered the American ATF’s bullshit identification system 3:41

Another nightmare to balance. Submarine in warship game.

sniper rifle.

i mean snipers are only bad in bad games. in every milsim i rather used an assault rifle tbh. so maybe just dont have sniper rifles if youre going for an arcade experience? its not that complicated tbh. not even complicated enough to even watch the video. ppl just dont understand what a XxsnajperxX's job is, because they are completely disconnected from reality, and also stupid ontop

This video quality is so good!! Also very interesting

I wish siege was like in E3, but it died as soon as they made operators so they could make money and surf on OW hype. Sad for those who stayed and wanted to play the fast paced game it was, i left on the 2nd Season cause it was a fast paced, but i'm not playing this garbage at this time and year lol

1:55 TF2!!!!

no steam open in my case also paid cosmetics are never justified btw is it a joke or something that u dont mention Microsoft? The single biggest company that tries to cash out the whole gaming industry.

Samsung odyssey g9 is the monitor for me

3:40 more like fellony

I've been thinking and... how do u balance Special weapons? (Ex.: Flame throwers, Explosive weapons, melee, shields, ect...)

I believe that the developers should create the game not about battlefield, but maybe about the killers in a city. Like in John Wick: you have to operate your weapon quick, you must be at close range with your opponents and also brawl them. And, besides that, you need to hide your gun until the moment of shooting. I'm not sure if it's possible to create a shooter with a fighting elements where the big guns are rarely used, but...

The talk about penetration and damage made me remember JA2 with 1.13 fan patch. Now, that gets convuleted. Ammo has "tumbling" factor, which basically means how much damage it does when.. well.. tumbling inside a person. There's armor penetration and if I recall right.. Ricochet stat as well.

8:57 wait why did the audio sound normal when he said "soviet era headphones" uhhhhhhhh

An exhaustion system would be game-changing for a pvp fps.

0:25 aimbot in the video? LMAO 🤣

14:18 *You are now manually breathing*

I think the sniper glint makes a ton of sense in something like Battlefield, given how large the maps can be, and how difficult it might be to even figure out where they are without it. Prone atop a hill the other side of the map for example.

I like the slugger shotgun

ur deduction and explanation is based off of a 5 year old child's logic holy shit

"le immortality... le bad! le death... le natural/good!" is the most pathetic sour grapes cope

I think the best way any game has dealt with the power of snipers is Battlefield 1 with their sweet spot mechanic. Basically every sniper has a sweet spot where it one-shot-body-shots, but every other range does reduced body damage. This makes it so different snipers have different advantaged for play range and it wasn't a one-shot at every range.

transphobe

3:52 i did indeed notice your mistake

I thought this was going to be more about the difficulty of coding snipers, not whining about getting one tapped by the one tap stick

After 9 months in develpment hopefully it was worth the wait

love the style

Anyone who complains about the shotgun as the user is simply not playing the shotgun correctly.

Ik ruik nederlands

What about Splatoon's equivalent of a Sniper, the charger class?

For me, a game like Ghost Recon Wildlands is a perfect game where pistols are totally viable. While of course they still aren’t my primary, you can still clear a pretty large base, especially if you focus on stealth/ baiting an enemy. One of the few games where I love to use them as a primary

There’s actually a really really easy way to fix pistols. The problem with shooters is that every OTHER weapon type in video games are super unrealistic. Automatic rifles are NOT easy to control the recoil of, especially at higher calibers. They are also much slower to handle. You wouldn’t be able to point and shoot on a dime and hit your target when you’re being fired at, especially while moving, or just after sprinting. Pistols, however, don’t have such issues. They are light, easy to aim, and can be fired easily while moving. Rifles are so often made to be just as easy to maneuver as any other weapon, and that’s simply not the case. It’s done so as to be easier for a player to use, but unless you’re a very highly trained soldier, it’s unlikely that the things performed with rifles in video games are realistic. Solution? Keep the quick handling and low recoil of pistols, nerf every other weapon type’s handling and recoil in return. I promise no one will like this change, but if you want realism, that’s how it needs to be.

If im gonna be able to create my own game business at future, i know who am i hiring to balance the game

My problem with shotguns in video games is the fact developers put bird shot and buck shot as the ammunition. In any law enforcement or military engagement they're using slugs. Even using buck shot you'll kill a target out to 30 yards. Slugs have a max effective range out to 75-100 yards.